Hi,

Would there be any interest in either replacing shells/pdksh with 
shells/ksh as our default ksh dependency? Or Uses/ksh.mk to select a 
default ksh for ports?

The reason I ask is, shells/ksh has its lineage from the original AT&T ksh 
(shells/ksh93) and is being actively developed (see shells/ksh-devel). 
shells/ksh upstream is also the ksh imported into and used by CDE 
(x11/cde*).

My position is, I'd prefer a Uses/ksh.mk. If people are interested, I'm 
willing to put this task on my todo list.


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <c...@freebsd.org>   Web:  https://FreeBSD.org
NTP:           <c...@nwtime.org>    Web:  https://nwtime.org

                        e^(i*pi)+1=0



Reply via email to