Alexey Dokuchaev <da...@freebsd.org> wrote: > It was very rash, but for endangered ports, they'll use any possibility.
Fair enough. > Muhammad seldom responds to email these days; for both of them I believe > this situation (Chris' domain renewal and him coming back online) is > uncomfortable as they both want for his ports to die ASAP. :( OK, good to know. I don't know anything about this history, I just thought it worth mentioning when I noticed 80 odd ports dropped as unfetchable which now all work. I didn't think that was a controversial thing to do, and didn't mean to stir up any hornets nest! Thanks for the heads-up though! :-) Cheers, Jamie
