> On Oct 27, 2023, at 11:37 PM, Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_mak...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > Moin Rahman wrote on 2023/10/28 01:50: >> But by no means it reduces the build >> time of texlive-texmf. Hope everyone enjoys that. :) >> > > There are updates in the current port tree that cause packages rebuilt by > glib updates to be rebuilt again :) > >> [00:01:19] [Dry Run] Deleting texlive-base-20230313_3.pkg: new dependency: >> print/ghostscript10 >> [00:01:22] [Dry Run] Deleting texlive-texmf-20230313.pkg: missing >> dependency: texlive-base-20230313_3 >> [00:01:39] [Dry Run] Ports to build: ... print/texlive-base >> print/texlive-texmf ... > > As far as I can see, it seems that it is possible to avoid rebuilding > texlive-texmf by manually running poudriere bulk with print/texlive-base. > However, something else may cause texlive-texmf package to be removed, so it > would be better to proceed gradually from libXdmcp, libxcb or something. > > I enjoy manual manipulation to minimize the time spent on rebuilding :) > > Regards. >
I believe you do not have the latest tree. I have removed the build time dependency to texlive-base. This is my latest build: https://pkg.bofh.network/data/latest-per-pkg/texlive-texmf/20230313/124i386-default.log And there is not call to texlive-base itself. Kind regards, Moin(bofh@ with tex@ hats on)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
