> On Oct 7, 2023, at 2:00 PM, Nuno Teixeira <edua...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > This 3.2 search might be counterproductive as we have an option "3.0+" which > also indicates 3.2 as a valid value. > > ports with 3.0+ will use 3.0 for building without changes . For this > particular update involving 3.2 shouldn't we focus on consumers using 3.2 > only?
The answer is both yes and no. :) There are some corner cases like let's say there is port A which was built using 3.2 and there is now port B which has 3.0+ and is now being built. There is a high chance that it will use the already available 3.2 rather than building 3.0. That's why it's better to be safe than sorry and also bump those ports. Kind regards, Moin(bofh@ with all hats off)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
