On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 02:18:20PM -0500, Theron wrote: > On 1/30/23 13:37, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:17:07PM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 7:59 PM Steve Kargl > >> <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > >>> % flang15 -o z a.f90 > >>> error: > >>> /usr/ports/devel/llvm15/work/llvm-project-15.0.7.src/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.cpp:312: > >>> not yet implemented: target not implemented > >>> % flang-new15 -o z a.f90 > >>> error: > >>> /usr/ports/devel/llvm15/work/llvm-project-15.0.7.src/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.cpp:312: > >>> not yet implemented: target not implemented > >>> > >>> Inspection of Target.cpp shows that the word "FreeBSD" > >>> does not appear anywhere. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Steve > >>> > >> This was fixed shortly after the release, but Flang itself still isn't > >> capable of producing working executables. It should probably be turned > >> off for now. > > I'll turn it off by default in llvm15 and the upcoming llvm16. > > > > -- Brooks > > with llvm-devel 16.0.d20230109 : > > % /usr/local/llvm-devel/bin/flang -o orbit orbit.f90?? -O3 -Wall -Wextra > -Werror?? -L/usr/local/llvm-devel/lib -lFortran_main -lFortranRuntime > -lFortranDecimal -lm > > produces a working executable for me, with results agreeing within 1ULP > with those of the executable compiled by devel/flang (expired).?? > Performance is reasonable (though inferior, but this is only one test). > Thus basic executable functionality, and at least one real world program > work.?? I do not see a reason to omit flang from upcoming llvm16.
Excellent. Thank you for the report. -- Brooks
