From: Roger Marquis <marquis_at_roble.com> wrote on Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 08:33:09 -0800 (PST) :
> mail/postfix is in git though, so the question then is why is it not > also on www.freebsd.org. When I look for postfix-3 it finds such (without also matching a bunch of other things with a "postfix-"[non-digit] prefix: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=%5Epostfix-3&stype=all&sektion=all finds: postfix-3.6.3,1 Secure alternative to widely-used Sendmail Description : Changes Maintained by: o...@freebsd.org Requires: icu-70.1_1,1, pcre-8.45 > Have also seen references to mail/postfix35 that is not in git or on > www.freebsd.org. As for mail/postfix35 : http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=main-amd64-default&build=p8b46fac80dc7_s4a7b49a0da from Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:25:02 GMT (start time) shows a build. This was for main's default/latest, not quarterly. There is also: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=b19fd158df56a285dcd38cc7310e908b05ecb982 showing mail/postfix35 was removed from git for having expired: QUOTE cleanup: Remove expired ports: . . . 2021-09-30 mail/postfix35: It is only here until FreeBSD 11 is EoL (Postfix >= 3.6 requires OpenSSL >= 1.1.x) END QUOTE (So, removed the same day as that bulk build was started.) > We're maintain our own, local, mail/postfix35(.13.2) > for libressl compatibility. It's not all that difficult (git checkout > ...;vi Makefile; make makesum; ...) but given how many sites use > libressl and how long postfix35 will be supported by Wietse (i.e, many > years) am wondering if it's worth checking-in? mail/postfix35 was present and then was removed in favor of versions requiring a more recent OpenSSL version --or that is how it looks. > On a similar note: is anyone is maintaing a local/custom port in > Poudriere or know where that might be documented? > > Roger Marquis > > > On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > > On 2021-12-17 4:20, Michael Grimm via freebsd-questions wrote: > >> I noticed today that mail/postfix and mail/postfix-current are missing on > >> > https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=%5Epostfix+&stype=all&sektion=all I agree that this search does not find: postfix-3.6.3,1 Secure alternative to widely-used Sendmail Description : Changes Maintained by: o...@freebsd.org Requires: icu-70.1_1,1, pcre-8.45 but: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=%5Epostfix-3&stype=all&sektion=all does. I've no clue what criteria for a match is in use for these query operations. > > > > They are there as postfix-sasl and postfix-current-sasl. That page has a > > bug > > with flavours such that it does not list the port with the default/first > > flavour. This is more obvious with the postfixadmin ports, which are > > listed > > with php80, not the default, php74. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com
