On 10/11/2021 9:53 AM, tech-lists wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 04:15:32PM -0400, J David wrote:
We use a staged approach to building packages with poudriere, with
several "bulk" commands, because some ports we rarely need take an
incredibly long time to build.  (Mainly languages, like rust, clang,
and gcc.)
[snip]

Basically, "bulk -f" seems to have started preemptively deleting any
existing package that isn't specifically listed in the given file or
required by a port that is listed.  So much for building things in
stages!

This wasn't the case previously, and I can't find any flags that
control this behavior on the man page.

Is this intentional?  Is there a way to get it not to do that?  (Short
of modifying our build scripts not to use -f anymore.)
I build in stages too, as there are some huge ports that don't play nice
in a bulk build but build fine when invoked in the form
poudriere -j jailname port_category/portname. I don't think it's
intentional. I'm seeing the same behaviour in poudriere-devel on stable/13 (poudriere-devel is poudriere-devel-3.3.99.20210907_1)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259085 explains it and has a workaround.
Sorry for the trouble. I've been busy and haven't had a chance to update 
the port yet.
I did add a MUTUALLY_EXCLUSIVE_BUILD_PACKAGES list that I need to push 
to the port too that should help with the root cause of the multiple 
bulk -f. That one depends on a queue rework which I don't have time to 
support at the moment but it's coming.
--
Bryan Drewery

Reply via email to