On 2021-05-25 16:27, Philipp Ost wrote:
Hmm. To me it just seems like a trade-off. IOW 6 of one && half a dozen on the other. Both seem to require as much work in the Makefile. But in my tiny little mind. MyOn 5/25/21 6:59 PM, Chris wrote:On 2021-05-25 04:27, Ronald Klop wrote:[snip]There must be a 101 ways to do this. But not having looked at the source for yourI have no opinion on this, but just trying to think along.Isn't it easier to add the math/nauty sources to the DISTFILES of your port?port, I'm inclined with Ronald.It wouldn't be unlike getting/using 2 sources from GitHub and combining them for the build. Simply use knob set aside for extra sources. IOW fetch the "extra" source and unpack it in the ${WRKSRC} tree along with your source && include the neededheaders from there.Yes, that would work, too. On the other hand, wouldn't that cause maintenance trouble down the line? I was trying to make use of as much infrastructure alreadyin place as possible.
suggestion seemed less complicated. :-)I'm NOT trying to suggest that my proposal was the best solution. Just wanted to
throw it out there in case it helped. :-) --Chris
HTH and good luck!Thanks! Philipp
0xB77893B2.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys