Hi, I've spotted that PoDoFo is unable to parse file if line breaks for a dict entry are slightly modified. See attached files. Podofo can parse `minimal` but not `minimal_two`. The difference between those two files is how the first object is formatted.
This one works fine:
```
1 0 obj
<< /Type /Catalog
/Pages 2 0 R
>>
endobj
```
This one doesn't work:
```
1 0 obj
<<
/Type /Catalog
/Pages 2 0 R
>>
endobj
```
In the PDF standard #7.3.7 I can see the structure similar to the first one
(which does work), but I don't see any restrictions saying that the line
break is prohibited.
Other libraries/apps seem to be able to read both files.
Is it a bug or just a strict conformity requirement?
Best regards,
Petr
minimal.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
minimal_two.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
