I hope this isn't against the forum rules to mention another project, but
like Victor we have a lot of customers that need monthly usage. I've been
using vnstat on my home router. Now it doesn't do application breakdowns
since that needs dpi, but if monthly usages helps then it might be worth a
try. http://humdi.net/vnstat/
Example output:
Per month:
admin@stig-home:~$ vnstat -m
eth0 / monthly
month rx | tx | total | avg. rate
------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
Oct '15 49.94 GiB | 3.67 GiB | 53.60 GiB | 167.87 kbit/s
Nov '15 106.27 GiB | 9.26 GiB | 115.53 GiB | 373.89 kbit/s
Dec '15 166.67 GiB | 8.37 GiB | 175.04 GiB | 548.23 kbit/s
Jan '16 185.51 GiB | 6.83 GiB | 192.33 GiB | 602.38 kbit/s
Feb '16 118.45 GiB | 7.06 GiB | 125.51 GiB | 420.21 kbit/s
Mar '16 109.82 GiB | 5.70 GiB | 115.52 GiB | 476.77 kbit/s
------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
estimated 144.71 GiB | 7.52 GiB | 152.23 GiB |
admin@stig-home:~$ vnstat -d
eth0 / daily
day rx | tx | total | avg. rate
------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
02/24/16 1.93 GiB | 512.70 MiB | 2.43 GiB | 236.03 kbit/s
02/25/16 980.94 MiB | 265.50 MiB | 1.22 GiB | 118.18 kbit/s
02/26/16 6.34 GiB | 305.11 MiB | 6.64 GiB | 644.96 kbit/s
02/27/16 13.19 GiB | 414.19 MiB | 13.60 GiB | 1.32 Mbit/s
02/28/16 5.37 GiB | 224.21 MiB | 5.59 GiB | 542.47 kbit/s
02/29/16 1.50 GiB | 450.65 MiB | 1.94 GiB | 188.62 kbit/s
03/01/16 2.30 GiB | 214.90 MiB | 2.51 GiB | 243.49 kbit/s
03/02/16 1.24 GiB | 177.02 MiB | 1.41 GiB | 136.85 kbit/s
03/03/16 1.32 GiB | 203.94 MiB | 1.52 GiB | 147.29 kbit/s
03/04/16 5.38 GiB | 248.26 MiB | 5.62 GiB | 545.56 kbit/s
03/05/16 16.40 GiB | 371.50 MiB | 16.76 GiB | 1.63 Mbit/s
03/06/16 14.60 GiB | 374.61 MiB | 14.97 GiB | 1.45 Mbit/s
03/07/16 1.28 GiB | 462.27 MiB | 1.73 GiB | 167.85 kbit/s
03/08/16 1.74 GiB | 274.97 MiB | 2.00 GiB | 194.64 kbit/s
03/09/16 748.99 MiB | 217.34 MiB | 966.33 MiB | 91.62 kbit/s
03/10/16 1.86 GiB | 209.54 MiB | 2.06 GiB | 200.37 kbit/s
03/11/16 5.02 GiB | 262.04 MiB | 5.28 GiB | 512.60 kbit/s
03/12/16 10.41 GiB | 304.21 MiB | 10.70 GiB | 1.04 Mbit/s
03/13/16 9.72 GiB | 326.63 MiB | 10.04 GiB | 974.51 kbit/s
03/14/16 1.83 GiB | 197.54 MiB | 2.02 GiB | 196.01 kbit/s
03/15/16 3.39 GiB | 186.71 MiB | 3.57 GiB | 346.90 kbit/s
03/16/16 1.40 GiB | 185.31 MiB | 1.58 GiB | 153.47 kbit/s
03/17/16 1.37 GiB | 180.40 MiB | 1.55 GiB | 150.07 kbit/s
03/18/16 1.71 GiB | 213.81 MiB | 1.91 GiB | 185.81 kbit/s
03/19/16 12.28 GiB | 412.81 MiB | 12.69 GiB | 1.23 Mbit/s
03/20/16 8.77 GiB | 284.41 MiB | 9.04 GiB | 878.12 kbit/s
03/21/16 872.39 MiB | 135.04 MiB | 0.98 GiB | 95.52 kbit/s
03/22/16 3.39 GiB | 192.81 MiB | 3.58 GiB | 347.33 kbit/s
03/23/16 2.68 GiB | 149.60 MiB | 2.82 GiB | 274.16 kbit/s
03/24/16 179.13 MiB | 55.53 MiB | 234.66 MiB | 39.25 kbit/s
------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
estimated 315 MiB | 97 MiB | 412 MiB |
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Paolo Lucente <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Dear Victor: no, pmacct is not meant to count traffic per application on a
> system. It is an interesting case but i also can't help pointing you to an
> application able to do that. Cheers, Paolo
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/pmacct/pmacct/issues/16#issuecomment-200981165>
>
_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
