Hi Ruben,

Yes, there is some config. You can read chapter "Internal buffering and
queueing" of the QUICKSTART document:

https://github.com/paololucente/pmacct/blob/master/pmacct/QUICKSTART

Essentially plugin_pipe_size becomes something not to care anymore and
plugin_pipe_amqp goes to 'true'. Then any extra directive is to config
aspects to connect to the RabbitMQ exchange (user, password, etc.).

Cheers,
Paolo

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 11:44:31PM +0200, Ruben Laban wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> This sure sounds interesting. I'll see if I can get around to
> deploying latest CVS to my test setup asap. Does the change of the
> queuing mechanism introduce a change in configuration as well? Like
> new/changed options, different sizing recommendations, etc.
> 
> Regards,
> Ruben Laban
> 
> On 22-8-2015 19:41, Paolo Lucente wrote:
> >Hi Ruben,
> >
> >Your email is very timely and i understand such fluctuations between low
> >and high traffic periods can happen in a libpcap deployment. A new feature
> >that has been introduced as part of 1.5.2 (which is currently in the CVS
> >and about to be released) is passing buffers inside pmacct - so from the
> >core process to the plugins - using a RabbitMQ broker, as an alternative
> >to the homegrown queueing infrastructure. This should help you working
> >with small buffers (so that data does not get "delayed" in case of low
> >traffic times) while keeping the queue size dynamic.
> >
> >Let me know if this looks of interest to you and, if yes, whether maybe
> >you have room to give it a try before 1.5.2 release, say throughout next
> >week.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Paolo
> >
> >On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:04:21AM +0200, Ruben Laban wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Lately I've been experimenting a lot with plugin_buffer_size,
> >>plugin_pipe_size and print_cache_size. My current conclusion is that
> >>it is in no way possible to tune pmacct in such a way that it will
> >>deal with low and (very) high traffic levels accurately:
> >>
> >>* Tune for low traffic: loss of data at high traffic
> >>* Tune for high traffic: data gets "delayed" at low traffic
> >>
> >>Am I missing something here is this something I'll have to live with
> >>(or otherwise work around).
> >>
> >>What I was hoping for was that by using large buffers (to
> >>accommodate high traffic levels) I'd get to deal properly with low
> >>and high traffic levels. I kinda expected buffers to flushed
> >>whenever data is being flushed to disk (using print plugin right
> >>now). This does not seem to be the case (completely).
> >>The fact that tuning for high traffic levels requires (a lot) more
> >>memory is easier to live with, memory's cheap after all.
> >>
> >>Some background info:
> >>Ubuntu 14.01
> >>Pmacct 1.5.1
> >>libpcap, without PF_RING or anything
> >>
> >>Current config:
> >>
> >>!
> >>debug: false
> >>!
> >>daemonize: true
> >>!
> >>core_proc_name: bond0
> >>!
> >>aggregate[bond0-all]: src_mac, dst_mac, src_host, dst_host,
> >>src_port, dst_port
> >>aggregate[bond0-aggr]: none
> >>!
> >>plugins: print[bond0-all], print[bond0-aggr]
> >>!
> >>!plugin_buffer_size: 1024
> >>!plugin_buffer_size: 4096
> >>!plugin_pipe_size: 10240000
> >>plugin_pipe_size: 40960000
> >>!
> >>files_umask: 027
> >>!files_uid: 0
> >>files_gid: 112
> >>!
> >>interface: bond0.1234
> >>!
> >>promisc: false
> >>!
> >>syslog: daemon
> >>!
> >>pidfile: /var/run/pmacctd-bond0.pid
> >>!
> >>print_output_file[bond0-all]: /tmp/pmacct-bond0-all-%Y%m%d-%H%M.csv
> >>print_output_file[bond0-aggr]: /tmp/pmacct-bond0-aggr-%Y%m%d-%H%M.csv
> >>!
> >>print_refresh_time: 60
> >>!
> >>print_time_roundoff: m
> >>!
> >>print_history: 1m
> >>!
> >>print_cache_entries: 323333
> >>!print_cache_entries: 100003
> >>!
> >>print_output_file_append: true
> >>!
> >>print_markers: true
> >>!
> >>!print_output: json
> >>print_output: csv
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Ruben Laban
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>pmacct-discussion mailing list
> >>http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >pmacct-discussion mailing list
> >http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
> >
> 

_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Reply via email to