Hi Joan,

This can be certainly improved, although it does not look a
quick win. It would at very least require introducing further
multi-threading in pmacctd core process - and very possibly
start leveraging libpfring. This sounds all more longer-term.

I was skimming through PF_RING docs and spotted a replication
capability. Imagine doing a flow-hashed replication of sniffed
packets to a set of virtual (loopback?) interfaces. On each of
these interfaces a pmacctd daemon would be listening. Then, if
working, the feature can be included as part of the pmacctd
daemon. This might be a short/mid-term solution.

Cheers,
Paolo

On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:01:21AM +0100, Joan wrote:
> Unfortunately, the good news didn't last, altought the performance is much
> better it's still not enough to process the whole traffic, it seems to me
> that it doesn't take advantage of the multicore from my CPU, using a single
> CPU each time. Never more than one simultaneously.
> Can that be improved?
> 
> $ ps -p 15139 -L -o pid,tid,psr,pcpu
>     PID   TID PSR %CPU
>   15139 15139   2 54.6
> 
>     PID   TID PSR %CPU
>   15139 15139   1 54.6
> 
>    PID   TID PSR %CPU
>   15139 15139   2 54.6
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2014-02-04 Paolo Lucente <[email protected]>:
> 
> > Hi Joan,
> >
> > Perfect, thanks for having summarized your solution.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Paolo
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 12:14:46AM +0100, Joan wrote:
> > > #- Compile pf_ring
> > > cd kernel; make install
> > > cd ../userland/lib; make install
> > > #We need also libpcap
> > > cd userland/libpcap-1.1.1-ring/
> > > make install
> > >
> > > #Load the kernel module on boot
> > > echo pf_ring >> /etc/modules
> > >
> > > #To compile pmacct with support for pf_ring
> > > ./configure --with-pcap-libs=/usr/local/lib/ --prefix=/usr --enable-mmap
> > > --enable-ipv6 --enable-threads
> > > make
> > > make install
> > >
> > > #After this we have pmacctd compiled, but there is on library that can't
> > be
> > > found
> > >
> > > linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xb778f000)
> > > libpcap.so.1 => not found
> > > libpfring.so => /usr/local/lib/libpfring.so (0xb775f000)
> > > libdl.so.2 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xb775a000)
> > > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
> > > (0xb7741000)
> > > libc.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb75de000)
> > > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7790000)
> > >
> > >
> > > In my case I fixed it like this:
> > >   cd /usr/lib
> > >   ln -s  /usr/local/lib/libpcap.so.1 libpcap.so.1
> > >
> > > Once that was done, pmacct could start, and the performance is really
> > much
> > > better, I'd say about a 30% less load in the system.
> > > I'll report any other findings I do,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your work again,
> > >
> > > Joan
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014-02-03 Paolo Lucente <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Joan,
> > > >
> > > > I did not look at PF_RING recently but the steps you outline
> > > > are those that make sense to me. Can you say what is precisely
> > > > not working linking pmacct against PF_RING libpcap? Feel free
> > > > to send me some output here or (maybe preferrably) privately,
> > > > then we summarize outcome here.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Paolo
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:49:22AM +0100, Joan wrote:
> > > > > Good morning,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am trying to use pmacct together with pf_ring to solve some
> > performance
> > > > > issues we are having, but I'm a bit lost about how to proceed. Can
> > anyone
> > > > > correct me if I'm wrong?
> > > > >
> > > > > - Download pf_ring module, compile and load into the system
> > > > > - Recompile pmacct using pf_ring's libpcap instead of the system one
> > > > (which
> > > > > isn't ready)
> > > > >
> > > > > This last part is what doesn't work for me so far, any help would be
> > > > > appreciated,
> > > > >
> > > > > Joan
> > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > pmacct-discussion mailing list
> > > > > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > pmacct-discussion mailing list
> > > > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
> > > >
> >

> _______________________________________________
> pmacct-discussion mailing list
> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists


_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Reply via email to