On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Paolo Lucente wrote: > To clarify: no traffic at all, both originated from and delivered > to your address blocks listed, gets tagged with 612/613/712/713. > Correct? Or some is and some is not?
Most is classified correctly, but about 7% doesn't match our filter.
tag packets bytes
--- ------- ----------
612 719349 479823644
613 819891 343327581
712 1782905 1944587590
713 1181386 1350451186
901 760620 297936088
902 154509 55994369
When aggregated on tag, src_host and dst_host shows they should fit the filters
filter.
901 94.18.227.134 198.51.100.92 29 1963
> Any chance the traffic is VLAN-tagged and/or MPLS-labelled and
> VLAN tag and/or MPLS labels are exposed to pmacct via IPFIX? In
> such a case you should reflect this in the filter, ie. 'vlan
> and ...', 'mpls and ...' or 'vlan and mpls and ...'.
This appears to be the case. If all rules are duplicated with
"vlan or (...)" everyting seems to work, only expected non-classified
traffic remains with tag 901 and 902.
How come the vlan expression is needed?
--
Kind regards,
Martin Topholm
pgp9j4TNHcz5I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pmacct-discussion mailing list http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
