Hi Paolo,

I've been trying to create a reproducable scenario to make troubleshooting 
easier. Yet I haven't been able to do so. Any hints or tips are welcome 
ofcourse. The 'funny' part is, when I either use * or specify the complete 
list of 512 ip addresses, the not-resetting hardly ever occurs on the lower 
150-200 ip addresses. Yet when I play around with a single ip address, I 
could sometimes reproduce it.

Looking forward to hear from you again with hopefully some more insight.

Regards,
Ruben Laban

On Thursday 14 June 2007, Paolo Lucente wrote:
> Hi Ruben,
> thanks for the valuable inputs. I'm trying to reproduce the issue now,
> having in mind all your tests. Will come back to you as soon as i'm able to
> shed any light on that.
>
> Cheers,
> Paolo
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:08:07PM +0200, Ruben Laban wrote:
> > I cheered too early. After letting my script run for a longer period, it
> > became clear that I still suffer from constantly increasing values for a
> > lot of ip addresses. It seems that only the first 150 or so ip address
> > are getting reset properly, though don't pin me down on that. I read in
> > the Changelog that batch requests can hold upto 4096 requests, so that
> > shouldn't be a problem either I'd say.
> > Running pmacct -r in a loop for each single ip address had crossed my
> > mind. Though when I did some (interactive) testing with a single ip
> > address, I once again had the problem that the counter didn't get reset
> > always. I tested this with running a ping to this host (1 ping / sec) and
> > running pmacct -r every second as well. Most of the time the counter
> > would be 0, yet sometimes the counter would increase each second and
> > magically drop down to 1 again at a certain point.
> >
> > Still confused, and still on a quest to find the cause of all this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ruben Laban
>
> _______________________________________________
> pmacct-discussion mailing list
> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists


_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Reply via email to