On 5/2/11, Word Wizard <[email protected]> wrote:
> The installer had the correct resolution, possibly because I edited the
> boot-loader menu with the vga=795 command line addition. However, the
> installation came up  640x480 with 320x240 as the only option,
> regardless of  any  command line edits. I managed to download and
> install the latest NVidia driver. Not that it did much good. It allowed
> me to adjust the resolution to what I used in prior Ubuntu/Kubuntu
> installations but didn't allow saving that configuration for subsequent
> sessions. The "save" dialogue appeared but did not allow saving the Xorg
> config file. Even invoking nvidia-settings as root did not help.
>
> That meant I'd be forced to re-adjust back from the standard 640x480
> each session. Not impossible of course, but a pitiful step backward from
> the easy NVidia configuration of Jaunty Lucid and Maverick. Even then,
> the display was corrupted when I invoked KDE's konsole app, perhaps
> because I had reconfigured the font size.
>
> I could hack all this. I could install (as root) a prior xorg config
> file which had the appropriate resolutions that I generated in Mepis
> 8.0. I could edit the fstab file to set up my preferred mount points.
> But why bother? Those fundamental mechanisms, as well as the numerous
> desktop bugs in Unity, should be fully operative in the installation of
> any respectable release. Shuttleworth will sure alienate any potential
> convert from Windows7 with this ungodly mess, and for what purpose?


<snip>

I am listening to all the chatter..

I am running Lucid and guess I will just continue.

It works fine and updates once a week.



-- 
Marvin J. Kosmal

Disclaimer: This email is not intended to provide medical advice,
diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily
reflect those of Farmer Marvin or any of the hens.
_______________________________________________
PLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Reply via email to