Couple of questions: - is bind9 a response to the vulnerability? - is it compatible with older dns systems?
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Michael Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:17:06 am pao p wrote: > > http://www.linux.com/feature/141080 > > > > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1447 > > All OS and All DNS had this fault. If using Bind 8 Remove and replace with > Bind 9, Yahoo had to replace all their DNS servers with Bind9. > > > > -- > Regards, > > Michael Cole > LPIC-1 > > > > "The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who > can't > read them. " > - Mark Twain > > "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our > abilities." > — J. K. Rowling > > "Wear the old coat and buy the new book." > — Austin Phelps > > "I'm not a teacher: only a fellow traveler of whom you asked the way. I > pointed ahead – ahead of myself as well as you." > — George Bernard Shaw > > > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph -- Regards, Danny Ching
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
