i would definitely go that way (non-journaling filesystem w/o swap) in order to achieve better performance (assuming distributed data storage redundancy is already in place and the machine have lots of room for additional RAM). but for those who haven't tried it or even thought hard about it, they'll think you're insane :)
On Dec 15, 2007 10:20 PM, Orlando Andico < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:... > ........ > That's why the big DB vendors etc. use raw filesystem, to > > get around the O/S caching mechanisms and gain more control. > > > > ..... > > Another thing you can try is run with no swap... > > >
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
