top

top - 13:05:18 up  1:49,  1 user,  load average: 0.17, 0.13, 0.06
Tasks: 107 total,   3 running, 103 sleeping,   0 stopped,   1 zombie
Cpu0  :  6.3%us,  0.9%sy,  0.0%ni, 92.3%id,  0.4%wa,  0.1%hi,  0.1%si,
0.0%st
Mem:    514444k total,   507384k used,     7060k free,    10976k buffers
Swap:   321260k total,    33856k used,   287404k free,   168936k cached



On 10/8/07, Eduardo Tongson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Press '1' when running top(1).
>
> E
> On 10/8/07, war cries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > Just checked the bootup process of our server (DELL PowerEdge 1750) and
> it
> > uses one processor. The Xeon processor is using HT technology so that's
> why
> > my /proc/cpuinfo output detected it as processor 0 and 1. But when I
> used
> > "top" command, the output tells me that HT is disabled, please correct
> me if
> > I'm wrong with my analysis.
> > ___
> > top
> >
> > top - 09:50:11 up 1 day, 16:13,  1 user,  load average: 0.66, 0.63, 0.58
> > Tasks: 162 total,   1 running, 161 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
> > Cpu(s):  0.7%us,  0.2%sy,  0.0%ni, 99.1%id,  0.0%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,
> > 0.0%st
> > Mem:   1035348k total,   956120k used,    79228k free,   167356k buffers
> > Swap:  1966072k total,        0k used,  1966072k free,   540536k cached
> >  ___
> >
> > Guys this server is a Proxy/Caching Server (squid) and Content Filtering
> > (dansguardian). We want to maximize the processing capability of this
> server
> > because currently it is serving a thousand (1000 min - 5000 max)
> researchers
> > in our institution.
> >
> > Need your advise. Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/5/07, Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well, what the OS thinks is really irrelevant w.r.t. Hyper-Threaded
> > processors.
> > >
> > > Hyper-Threading only gives 5% performance improvement over a single
> > > thread, on CPU-bound activities. A thread is much, much less than a
> > > core.
> > >
> > > That actually explains why you only see one or two bars with lots of
> > activity.
> > >
> > > To quote one of my colleagues from Redwood Shores:
> > >
> > > "Yes. Hyperthreading only works if there are lots of L2 cache misses.
> > > Then the CPU can work on the pretend CPU's work while waiting. But if
> > > there were no cache misses then there would be zero benefit to HT. So
> > > the tighter your code is the less HT works.
> > >
> > > HT is basically a fraud. You are seeing exactly what you will with
> > > almost anu software, not just with TimesTen. If you get even 5%
> > > improvement then you did good. No one should expect much more."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/5/07, Michael Tinsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ..
> > > > I have a server that has a dual-core, HT-enabled processor.  Ubuntu
> says
> > it
> > > > has 4 processors.  htop shows 4 bars for processors, but most of the
> > time
> > > > only one or two have activity.
> > > _________________________________________________
> > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> > > [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
> > > Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
> > > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
> > >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________
> > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> > [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
> > Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
> > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
> >
> _________________________________________________
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
> Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to