And these kind of things makes me think twice regarding a Fedora install.
:-) No flaming intended, just stating a fact of life.

On 7/15/07, ralph bacolod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

so this is a pre-compiled kernel? and a development kernel to boot!


On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 11:30:07PM -0700, Pablo Manalastas wrote:
> In my Yahoo blog:

> http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-0OCENX4haau1oA38TsiK4DP2YLk-?cq=1&p=89

> I mentioned an error in the latest release of the
> kernel for Fedora Rawhide.  Here is the post:

> I am running Fedora Rawhide, the latest development
> release, which is Fedora version 7.89. Yesterday, I
> installed the latest kernel update, which is
> 2.6.23-0.15.rc0.git1.fc8. So
> vmlinuz-2.6.23-0.15.rc0.git1.fc8 was installed in
> /boot, and the modules were installed in
> /lib/modules/2.6.23-0.15.rc0.git1.fc8/. However, when
> you do the command

> uname -r

> you get the version/release number
> 2.6.22-0.15.rc0.git1.fc8. That is 2.6.22 and not
> 2.6.23.

> So during boot up, there were so many modules that
> were not loaded, as the kernel could not find them,
> since they were expected to be in
> /lib/modules/2.6.22-0.15.rc0.git1.fc8. Why did the
> Fedora kernel developers release such an incorrectly
> compiled kernel?

> Of course there is an easy fix. Just create a symbolic
> link /lib/modules/2.6.22-0.15.rc0.git1.fc8 to
> /lib/nodules/2.6.23-0.15.rc0.git1.fc8, and reboot, and
> the problem is solved. What about the version
> numberings in the kernel and the modules, themselves?
> I wonder why the link works when it does not fix the
> internal version numbers.

> In the meantime, I am waiting for the next kernel
> update.

> _________________________________________________
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
> Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph


>  ** ACCEPT: CRM114 PASS osb unique microgroom Matcher **
> CLASSIFY fails; success probability: 0.0013  pR: -2.8711
> Best match to file #1 (spam.css) prob: 0.9987  pR: 2.8711
> Total features in input file: 3144
> #0 (nonspam.css): features: 12580, hits: 30011, prob: 1.34e-03, pR:  -
2.87
> #1 (spam.css): features: 67782, hits: 24838, prob: 9.99e-01, pR:   2.87


--
--
Ralph Bacolod,RMT,MT
http://rbacolod.blogspot.com

_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph




--
Mhac Janapin
PBTS SysAd
=============
http://mulingsilang.blogspot.com
=============
I'm an Open Source Enthusiast. c",)
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to