On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Nikhil Karkare <nkark...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I want to do the same. Some looking got me the following links - don't know > how effective they are: > http://linux-ip.net/html/adv-multi-internet.html > http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html > http://www.shorewall.net/ > http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-471856.html > > -Nikhil. > > -- > Nikhil Karkare > http://coupleofthoughts.wordpress.com > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Mayuresh <mayur...@acm.org> wrote: > > > Fed up of downtime of my ISP and having heard the same stories about > > another > > ISP operating in the area, I am wondering whether it's possible to > > subscribe > > to both of them for redundancy. > > > > However, it won't be an economical proposition if used only for > redundancy. > > Also, as a home user there are no multiple simultaneous users. So only > way > > both connections would get utilized (when both are up!) and give value > for > > money is if for a single user they both could serve in tandem. In other > > words, > > let's say I have both connections of 128 kbps, I should get an effective > > download speed of 256kbps for download of even a SINGLE file (and not > > multiple > > files simultaneously). > > > > To the extent I searched around, it looks difficult or impossible. I > think > > it's > > a reasonable consumer expectation, though do not know about its > > feasibility. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Mayuresh. > > _______________________________________ > > Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List > > > _______________________________________ > Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List > Refer http://www.zeroshell.net/eng/ for load balancing its an dedicated OS to solve all your problems Abhishek Nagar _______________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List
