On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Shakthi Kannan <shakthim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> --- 2009/5/25 म.हा.सा.ग.र <o.s....@guruvision.com>:
> | The relevant part of the discussions:
> | "Red Hat is the most difficult distributions to handle in Linux scene"
> \--
>
> It would be very useful to know exactly what were the various
> *difficulties* that these 3-4 individuals faced. Without it, i will
> not rule out PEBKAC as a reason.
This was a logical conclusion at the end of three different situations
handling by the same set of engineers :-) PEBKAC? Sure go ahead and
assume whatever fits your taste :-)
> You still have the *choice* of other distributions.
which we did enjoy, and really converted the user to Linux...
Which distrro? PEBKAC symtoms don't allow freedom to dis-close such
trivial details.
>
> ---
> | to me, Linux has been improving by relying on users' feedback
> \--
>
> Too generic a statement, IMO. Distros differ quite a lot in choosing
> what they ship, how they ship it, and how they work together. There is
> quite a lot of choice available today, and it would be inappropriate
> to blame a whole lot just because of the experience with one.
>
> Thanks for your honest feedback,
no blaming the whole lot... we know Red Hat is yet another good
distro, just that it is too difficult for beginners like we :-)
sinn seerly yours!
--
Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it.
-- Salvador Dali
_______________________________________
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List
