ഓം wrote: [snipping off some portions] and assuming that you are being sarcastic or like (based on a few earlier mails on other threads)
> Why can't these .h files be called .i files, they are include files > and what better suffix for include files that .i? > Are we still following what some "stdio.h" wrote 15 or more years ago > without bothering to why not change for better? > > Any suggestion on this front? > > Why can't compilers be built to have these files included at any place > in the program other than at the start? > > Just curious!! http://eli-project.sourceforge.net/c_html/c.html is one place to start with perhaps. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/ is another along with http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/ ~sankarshan -- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in) List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.