On 10/23/07, Desi Penguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Per my understanding, hindi should be more like "gyan" ज्ञान is sanskrit. > I know Roman script can not accurately represent all the devnagari > alphabets. But "jn" is more closer than "dnyn". By the way, the original > alphabet used in sankrit is "moolashar", not "jodakshar". >
That's similar to saying positive infinity (of calculus) if closer than negative infinity to zero :-) both are equally distant as long as you are deriving them not directly inputting them.. Perhaps if someone has time, then that person can work on how to get ज्ञ as a single keystroke input on keyboard without scim (since I do not know how scim handles that yet).
-- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in) List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.
