-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 shirish wrote:
Another point, the licensing > has to be under FOSS. It could be gpl, gpl2, gpl2+ restrictions, gpl3, > apache, bsd or any of the derivatives. Here's a pointer to know about > which license one could use perhaps . A somewhat comprehensive listing > of licenses and what they mean. http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ Since the notion of the mashup is the formation of ad-hoc teams with a defined purpose, some of the mashups might actually derive from upstream/existing licensed works and thus be comfortably placed about which license to choose. For the ones that are new mashups (which is perhaps orthogonal to the entire concept of being "mashed" I guess) the license question would perhaps be relevant. http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category is another link that folks might like to read up in that event. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG263cXQZpNTcrCzMRAkDaAKDKzbh4WhtrVXUHrnHqxE04Bl8FswCffXgg HmzwdrIy7jk8mIe5TKHbYyQ= =CQwA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in) List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.
