On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 8:58:34 PM UTC Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Personally I find it important that the developers have a say in what > the logo is. I think we identify by it and the logo needs to work with > us.
We did have a say, more than one (on the forums, we had the logo's posted for feedback on the wiki, , and neither process has delivered a firm decision when we got to make it. Let's admit defeat on this process and move on. Let's also accept that aside from potential technical issues (which I think there are none deal-breaking), that the choice of a logo boils down to sentimental value, and being able to identify one's work and effort with the logo. To me personally, I can connect quite well to the current-de-facto-temporary logo. I think at this point, it's entirely fair to those who are most affected by the lack of a clear branding (mainly our logo) to say "Look guys, you had months to come to a decision, you haven't, we're now moving on with this.". -- sebas Sebastian Kügler • http://vizZzion.org • http://www.kde.org
