Hi, I agree with Friedrich and Kainz.a, but what user ? I feel what Friedrich speak a basic user and Kainz.a a advanced user. All process the bug info report is for advanced user; it happen. I am enduser and I have KDE for everyone.
Hazlo simple. Cheers. El mar., 5 de abril de 2016 10:59 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer < thomas.pfeif...@kde.org> escribió: > On Dienstag, 5. April 2016 10:45:28 CEST Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > So with the experience of the 40 plugins in KWin I think the possible > > > gains presented here do not justify the addition of code and UI > elements. > > I have to disagree. You can't really compare KWin plug-ins of which users > > usually shouldn't even be aware they are a thing to Plasma applets which > > are user-facing mini applications. > > > > A user might see the network applet shows crap and so they want to report > > specifically that to the network guy, or a minor issue in Kickoff, etc. > and > > we usually have a bko component for all applets assigned to the right > guy. > > > > Re the honor of third party applets: yes, that too, we used to have that > in > > widget explorer but now there's nowhere to see license or author info. > > > I agree with Kai: Plasmoids are much more "standalone" from a user's > perspective than KWin effects. As he said: They are mini applications, > after > all. > And they are more likely to have bugs which the user can actually associate > with a specific Plasmoid. If a KWin effect goes wrong, users would first > have to > identify which one in the list it is, whereas for a Plasmoid it's clear: > You > just click on the thing that went bad. > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel