On Friday 15 March 2013 17:44:23 Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Freitag, 15. März 2013 14:38:45 CEST, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > Since [1] KWin has the internal KDecorationBridge as a public part of the > > KDecoration API to allow Compiz to implement it. This is rather > > unfortunate as > > it makes our life more difficult as we cannot extend our > > internal API without > > doing subclassing and all that effort (see for example [2]). > > Actually it makes the bridge more or less pointless :-( > > > Given that it seems like nobody is still using Compiz instead > > of KWin I do not see why we should continue to support it. > > Even iff, there's no discontinue at all - there's just a coordination issue > between two projects. > > Comments? > > I'm not 100% sure, but if compiz/libdecoration.so is (rather?!) ABI stable, > whoever wants to maintain compiz-decorator-kde (unlikely canonical...) > could preferably do in KDE (/extragear?) where we can easily keep it > compatible (to the internal KWin API) resp. it would then release in sync > with KDE (or later on KWin) I had suggested that to the Compiz devs years ago, but they didn't want. [1] -- Martin Gräßlin [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/2011-January/003451.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
