On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:04:18 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?RHlsYW4gQcOvc3Np?=
<bob.dyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le mar. 17 oct. 2023 à 19:59, Nicholas D Steeves <s...@debian.org> a écrit :

> > 0.3.82-1~bpo12+1 solves the bug :)
>
> Great! :-)
>
> > Rather than close this bug as fixed right away, do you think it would be
> > worthwhile to keep it open and/or add something to the bookworm release
> > notes?  I could write a few words if you'd prefer.  There are always
> > questions of "can I switch to $new_technology without regressions", and
> > I think this would help answer them.
>
> Sure, if you think it could be useful then it is worth adding something in the
> bookworm release note (maybe also in the debian pipewire wiki page?).

We discussed this bug at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2024/12/msg00001.html -
Have you considered fixing this in a bookworm point release rather
than only stable-backports?

If that isn't a solution, there are quite a few unanswered questions
at https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/201

_______________________________________________
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers

Reply via email to