Michael Biebl wrote: > I've contemplated dropping the Multi-Arch: foreign notation in systemd and > maybe also for policykit-1. > > Is there a valid use case where we need/want a foreign systemd/policykit-1?
Wouldn't that go in the wrong direction? I'd think that we want the native systemd or policykit daemon to satisfy a foreign dependency, and that's what `Multi-Arch: foreign` allows. In fact https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec#line-1-3 suggests that the scenario I ended up in *should* not have happened; the installer should've preferred the native (amd64 for me) version of the package. So that's an argument in favor of leaving things as they are. Bertram _______________________________________________ Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list Pkg-utopia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers
