Am 12.07.23 um 11:14 schrieb Josh Triplett:
Package: libblockdev-mdraid3 Version: 3.0.1-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.orgCurrent udisks2 has a dependency on libblockdev-mdraid3, and libblockdev-mdraid3 has a dependency on mdadm. This effectively makes mdadm required on desktop systems. As I understand it from https://github.com/storaged-project/udisks/issues/1142 , udisks2 needs to depend on libblockdev-mdraid3. (And that much isn't necessarily an issue, it's just a library.) Would it be possible for libblockdev-mdraid3 to avoid pulling in mdadm,
By avoid, I assume you mean not even demoting it to Recommends would be an option for you, but drop the dependency completely (or make it a Suggests)
so that systems not using RAID don't have to have mdadm and its associated configuration and boot-time logic installed?
And then I'll get bug reports like https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989493 I can't really win this.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list Pkg-utopia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers
