On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Russell Coker <russ...@coker.com.au> wrote: > > Package: systemd > Version: 232-20 > Severity: normal > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-March/150031.html > > The use of a /run tmpfs started in March 2011. I think it's time for all > software to use /run directly not via the /var/run symlink. > > Among other things we have special code in the SE Linux policy to deal with > access through both names for initial labeling and I'd like to just have 1 > canonical name. > > # strings /usr/lib/systemd/libsystemd-shared-232.so|grep var.run.dbus > kernel:path=/sys/fs/kdbus/0-system/bus;unix:path=/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket
As you already know, this is the canonical address and has not been changed by the dbus maintainers[1]. I don't think we should change this until dbus itself has moved over. I'm not familiar with SELinux, but this string you have reported is never used to create a file AFAICT. Systemd (sd-bus, actually) only uses this to attempt connecting to the system dbus daemon. Is it still a problem in this case? [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783321 -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
