On Mar 29, Michael Biebl <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not a huge fan of micro packages and splitting everything up. Where > would you draw the line. Uncommon dependencies for not widely used/useful features. I think that a libdw dependency is justifiable because it provides stack traces which may be invaluable for debugging a crash, but so far http-based forwarding of logs does not appear to be very popular. Is it enabled at all in RHEL7? This could be a good benchmark.
> pitti was suggesting a systemd-extras package, but I'm not a huge fan of > this idea either since it's unclear what would go into this package and > what not and it complicates things if we have to move stuff around. Me neither. > For the time being, I'd say, we should simply be very conservative about > what features we enable, which means not enabled the remote journal > features for now. It would surely be beneficial if the users arguing for support of this feature could document its popularity. -- ciao, Marco
pgpuEYDNVx6Aa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
