Control: tags -1 wontfix
Control: close -1

On Sun, 26 May 2024 18:15:12 +0100 Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 help
> 
> On Sat, 09 Dec 2023 23:53:17 +0100 Matteo Settenvini
> <matteo.settenv...@montecristosoftware.eu> wrote:
> > Package: systemd-boot
> > Version: 255-1
> > Severity: important
> > 
> > Dear Maintainer,
> > 
> > as per
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033725 and
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996202, there
seems
> to be no
> > willingness to sign esp/EFI/systemd/systemd-bootx64.efi and
> > esp/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI with the Debian CA.
> > 
> >   Sidenote: (Maybe this decision should be revisited? We are a
couple
> of years
> >   later and systemd-boot is the only proper Linux bootloader able
to
> do
> >   measured boot).
> 
> This is in progress and should hopefully happen for Trixie.

Signed amd64 and arm64 packages are now available in unstable:

https://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/systemd-boot-efi-amd64-signed/
https://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/systemd-boot-efi-arm64-signed/

Complex integration for self-signing is no longer needed. It is still
possible to do locally for those who want to, but we don't need to
carry functionality specifically for it in the package, hence closing
this.

Reply via email to