Your message dated Thu, 26 Dec 2024 20:39:45 +0100
with message-id <11d8ac01-ac4c-4bc1-a9b0-6315ef342...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: say which 'defaults' are which better
has caused the Debian Bug report #556893,
regarding say which 'defaults' are which better
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
556893: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556893
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sysv-rc
Version: 2.87dsf-8
Severity: wishlist
Say, perhaps these messages should differentiate better the two origins
of the definition of 'defaults':
# update-rc.d network-manager defaults
update-rc.d: using dependency based boot sequencing
insserv: warning: current start runlevel(s) (empty) of script `network-manager'
overwrites defaults (2 3 4 5).
insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 2 3 4 5 6) of script
`network-manager' overwrites defaults (0 1 6).
Or else the user will think "but I did say defaults".
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 23 May 2022 22:23:26 +0200 Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:59:14 +0800 jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: sysv-rc
> Version: 2.87dsf-8
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Say, perhaps these messages should differentiate better the two origins
> of the definition of 'defaults':
>
> # update-rc.d network-manager defaults
> update-rc.d: using dependency based boot sequencing
> insserv: warning: current start runlevel(s) (empty) of script
`network-manager' overwrites defaults (2 3 4 5).
> insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 2 3 4 5 6) of script
`network-manager' overwrites defaults (0 1 6).
>
> Or else the user will think "but I did say defaults".
Let's close this.
init-system-helpers no longer by default uses insserv.
And if insserv is used, I don't think we should supress any warning
messages.
And if there are warning messages by insserv that should not be shown or
improved, it's something that needs to be addressed in insserv.
Actually close the issue.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
