Your message dated Sat, 18 Nov 2023 22:26:16 +0100
with message-id <e6500862-8a57-4b2f-81a3-4240b0bb5...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1032197: systemd: journalctl -o short-iso-precise not
compatible with RFC 3339
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032197,
regarding systemd: journalctl -o short-iso-precise not compatible with RFC 3339
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1032197: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032197
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: systemd
Version: 252.5-2
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: tom+deb...@ankh.fr.eu.org
Dear Maintainer,
Recent versions of rsyslog (as used in sid) are now using by default
timestamps based on RFC 3339 (Date and Time on the Internet:
Timestamps).
The "-o short-iso-precise" journalctl option uses an ISO 8601 profile
that is not compatible with RFC 3339 (it misses a ':' between the hours
and minutes in the timezone offset).
Making journalct's ISO 8601 format compatible with RFC 3339 would make
things easier for people comparing journalctl output with rsyslog
output, for instance those like me using the 'logcheck' package (which,
in sid, recently started checking by default the systemd journal too).
Would it be possible to change the short-iso-precise in this way, or if
you prefer not changing it, maybe adding a new short-rfc3339-precise
option ? (and probably doing the same thing for short-iso / short-rfc339
too) ?
Best regards,
Tom
--
Thomas Parmelan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 255~rc2-1
Hi Thomas
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 15:24:36 +0100 Thomas Parmelan
<tom+deb...@ankh.fr.eu.org> wrote:
Hi Michael,
Le mercredi 01 mars 2023 à 18:10, d'après
Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> :
> I think this could be a useful addition. That said, this should be
> discussed/implemented upstream and not via a downstream patch.
>
> Can you thus please file an issue upstream at
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/
Thanks for your answer. I opened the following issue:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/26639
The current version in unstable addresses this issue.
So closing this issue for that version.
Regards,
Michael
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
