Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> writes: > On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>> If you prefer, I can reword the general rule to be stricter, ie: >> "packages must not use diversions where native mechanisms are >> available" or so. Would this be better? > "native mechanisms" seems to vague. I suggested "must not be used when a suitable override mechanism that accomplishes the same goal is already available." Does that sound okay? It's a bit weaker and opens the door to arguments about whether the native override mechanism accomplishes the same goal, but I think that's a feature here rather than a bug. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
