Your message dated Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:46:19 +0200 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#970391: /bin/systemctl: Changes in [Install] not valued by "systemctl enable" if service already enabled. has caused the Debian Bug report #970391, regarding /bin/systemctl: Changes in [Install] not valued by "systemctl enable" if service already enabled. to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 970391: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970391 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: systemd Version: 241-7~deb10u4 Severity: wishlist File: /bin/systemctl Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Added a "RequiredBy=B.service" in existing A.service ([Install]-section) to target dependencies. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Used "systemctl enable A.service" as well as "systemctl daemon-reload" to activate "RequiredBy"-dependency. Instead B.service had to be disabled and re-enabled to properly create "Requires"-dependency. * What was the outcome of this action? Dependency was not generated. * What outcome did you expect instead? Expected "B.service.requires/A.service" to be created directly if "systemctl enable B.service" is executed, even when B.service is already enabled. BR & TY, Felix -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages systemd depends on: ii adduser 3.118 ii libacl1 2.2.53-4 ii libapparmor1 2.13.2-10 ii libaudit1 1:2.8.4-3 ii libblkid1 2.33.1-0.1 ii libc6 2.28-10 ii libcap2 1:2.25-2 ii libcryptsetup12 2:2.1.0-5+deb10u2 ii libgcrypt20 1.8.4-5 ii libgnutls30 3.6.7-4+deb10u5 ii libgpg-error0 1.35-1 ii libidn11 1.33-2.2 ii libip4tc0 1.8.2-4 ii libkmod2 26-1 ii liblz4-1 1.8.3-1 ii liblzma5 5.2.4-1 ii libmount1 2.33.1-0.1 ii libpam0g 1.3.1-5 ii libseccomp2 2.3.3-4 ii libselinux1 2.8-1+b1 ii libsystemd0 241-7~deb10u4 ii mount 2.33.1-0.1 ii util-linux 2.33.1-0.1 Versions of packages systemd recommends: ii dbus 1.12.20-0+deb10u1 ii libpam-systemd 241-7~deb10u4 Versions of packages systemd suggests: ii policykit-1 0.105-25 pn systemd-container <none> Versions of packages systemd is related to: pn dracut <none> ii initramfs-tools 0.133+deb10u1 ii udev 241-7~deb10u4 -- Configuration Files: /etc/systemd/journald.conf changed [not included] -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 13:12 +0000, Felix Neuper wrote: > Kindly close and mark as wrongly reported. Doing so. Ansgar
--- End Message ---
