Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:11:41 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#901313: ignoring: Numerical argument out of domain
has caused the Debian Bug report #901313,
regarding ignoring: Numerical argument out of domain
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
901313: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901313
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: systemd
Version: 238-5
Now lots of these messages:
Jun 11 17:24:42 jidanni6 systemd[230]: Failed to add rule for system call
umount() / -10070, ignoring: Numerical argument out of domain
Jun 11 17:24:42 jidanni6 systemd[230]: Failed to add rule for system call
profil() / -10040, ignoring: Numerical argument out of domain
Jun 11 17:24:42 jidanni6 systemd[230]: Failed to add rule for system call
lock() / -10027, ignoring: Numerical argument out of domain
Jun 11 17:24:42 jidanni6 systemd[230]: Failed to add rule for system call
gtty() / -10022, ignoring: Numerical argument out of domain
Jun 11 17:24:42 jidanni6 systemd[230]: Failed to add rule for system call
prof() / -10039, ignoring: Numerical argument out of domain
Jun 11 17:24:42 jidanni6 systemd[230]: Failed to add rule for system call
rtas() / -10187, ignoring: Numerical argument out of domain
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 07:02:19 +0800 =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> "MB" == Michael Biebl <[email protected]> writes:
> >> Jun 11 17:24:42 jidanni6 systemd[230]: Failed to add rule for system call
> >> gtty() / -10022, ignoring: Numerical argument out of domain
> >> Jun 11 17:24:42 jidanni6 systemd[230]: Failed to add rule for system call
> >> prof() / -10039, ignoring: Numerical argument out of domain
> >> Jun 11 17:24:42 jidanni6 systemd[230]: Failed to add rule for system call
> >> rtas() / -10187, ignoring: Numerical argument out of domain
>
> MB> That just seems to be a debug message.
> MB> Do you have debug logging enabled?
> MB> Can you provide your kernel command line as well (cat /proc/cmdline)
>
> # cat /proc/cmdline
> BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.16.0-2-amd64 root=UUID=50... ro
> systemd.log_level=debug systemd.log_target=kmsg log_buf_len=262144
> enforcing=0 panic=33 earlyprintk=vga
>
> So it seems debugging caught some newly introduced inefficiencies!
I've raised this upstream at
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9292 and this bug report was
closed with the following reply:
"
Well, you asked for debug output, and you got debug output.
systemd's default seccomp filters list syscalls that are not available
on all archs, and that's entirely OK. For example, i386 has umount()
while x86-64 does not (it has umount2() instead). libseccomp returns
EDOM for those syscalls. Which is fine to ignore, after all these system
calls really don't exist on those archs.
We show these in the debug output so that developers can verify that
only syscalls that really don't exist result in EDOM. Which in the case
above is the case, hence there's really nothing strange here.
And if you wonder why we include those i386-only syscalls in our lists
even if we are called for x86-64: we install syscall filters for i386,
for x32 and for x86-64 on x86-64 systems, and thus we need to list the
syscalls of all relevant ABIs. Also, listing all syscalls make the
system behave more alike on all archs, and "systemd-analyze
syscall-filter" will reflect the same data everywhere.
Hence, really, there's nothing to fix here. it's logged at debug level
for a reason. If it was something relevant, it would be logged on a
higher level.
"
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
