Hi Simon, Please, do what you need :D
I have no problem, do a merge if this is good for the package. Regards, El lun, 23 de feb. de 2026 18:14, Simon Quigley <[email protected]> escribió: > Hi Manuel, > > We can work together. :) > > Your change to use packaged dependencies looks like exactly what we need > to solve the CI failure. Would you like to merge that on to debian/latest, > or would you like me to proceed? > > Thanks for your work, > Simon > > > On February 23, 2026 4:07:13 PM CST, Manuel Guerra < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> If Simon proceeds with the package update, he can disregard my changes to >> the debian/upstream branch. >> >> Regards, >> >> El lun, 23 de feb. de 2026 17:54, Simon Quigley <[email protected]> >> escribió: >> >>> Hi Soren, all, >>> >>> This sounds good to me. I have 2.6.3 staged in Salsa, please let me know >>> if I should upload that or hold off for now. >>> >>> Thanks for looking into this! Let me know if I can help further. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Simon Quigley >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> On February 23, 2026 3:11:27 PM CST, Soren Stoutner <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Simon and Manuel, >>>> >>>> I see that you have both been doing work on ruby-commonmarker. The current >>>> version in Debian is 0.23.10, which is a legacy branch. The current >>>> upstream >>>> version is 2.6.3 which involves a lot of breaking changes. >>>> >>>> There are two packages in Debian that depend on ruby-commonmarker: redmine >>>> and ruby-jekyll-commonmark. >>>> >>>> The current version of redmine requires commonmarker ~> 2.3.0. >>>> >>>> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/redmine/-/blob/debian/latest/Gemfile? >>>> ref_type=heads#L21 >>>> >>>> There does not appear to be significant differences between commonmarker >>>> 2.3.0 >>>> and 2.6.3, so I think we are probably safe to use the latest upstream. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/gjtorikian/commonmarker/releases >>>> >>>> Doing so will break ruby-jekyll-commonmark, which depends on commonmarker >>>> -> >>>> 0.23.4. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll-commonmark/blob/master/jekyll-commonmark.gemspec#L19 >>>> >>>> There is an open upstream issue to support commonmarker 2.x, but so far >>>> there >>>> has been no response. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll-commonmark/issues/61 >>>> >>>> ruby-jekyll-commonmark has low popcon installs. >>>> >>>> https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=ruby-jekyll-commonmark >>>> >>>> I try to avoid doing updates that break software. However, in this case, I >>>> propose we update ruby-commonmarker to fix redmine and the three >>>> transitions >>>> it is blocking. >>>> >>>> I have included Daniel, the Uploader of ruby-jekyll-commonmark, to get his >>>> feedback. >>>> >>>>
_______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
