2017-11-07 16:48 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>: > Hi, > > On 07/11/17 12:32, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > 2017-11-07 11:36 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>: > >> On 07/11/17 10:32, James Cowgill wrote: > >>> "Distribution of this memo is unlimited." is not a free license. > >> > >> However on closer inspection they are free for other reasons. You should > >> probably include the relevant parts of libogg's debian/copyright in > >> audacity's debian/copyright. > >> > >> https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/libo/libogg/copyright-1.3.2-1 > >> > > > > Thank you James for spotting this ... as not-native English speaker > > sometimes missing point :/ > > Please check my commit if all is fixed now. > > There are some issues. > > As far as I can tell, RFC 3533 and RFC 5334 are not under the same > license, but your copyright file claims they are. Using "License: RFC" > looks wrong and someone might read it as the license for all RFCs (which > is not the case). I think you should have one section for each RFC eg > "RFC-3533" and "RFC-5334". > > You made a copy-paste error in the license for RFC 5334 (part is > duplicated). > > The indentation on the email headers is wrong. If you look at libogg's > copyright file, it is indented correctly (remember email headers use the > same format as Debian control files). > > You should not refer to tracker.debian.org because that file will > disappear the next time libogg is uploaded. >
Hopefully fixed now ;) ... please check commit best rerads mira
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
