Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:46:27 +0000
with message-id
<caj0cceb+7c8xae0a+jdcjqso9+fypf92cnbep+j3e8vwo_1...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#834953: ams: Should this package be removed?
has caused the Debian Bug report #834953,
regarding ams: Should this package be removed?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
834953: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834953
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ams
Severity: normal
Hi,
The package "ams" hasn't seen an upstream release since April 2014
(cf. http://alsamodular.sourceforge.net/). The last upload to debian
was on 2014-04-12.
It currently has one RC bug, and if I read popcon correctly, 46
installations: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=ams
I also checked that there are currently no reverse dependencies:
siretart@coccia:~$ dak rm -Rn ams
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
ams | 2.1.1-1 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips,
mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
<pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
------------------- Reason -------------------
----------------------------------------------
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.
I would recommend removing this package. If you agree, please reassign
this bug to the "ftp.debian.org" pseudo package and retitle "RoM: dead upstream"
Thanks,
Reinhard
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 6:42 AM Alessio Treglia <ales...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Reinhard,
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@debian.org>
> wrote:
> > The package "ams" hasn't seen an upstream release since April 2014
> > (cf. http://alsamodular.sourceforge.net/). The last upload to debian
> > was on 2014-04-12.
> >
> > It currently has one RC bug, and if I read popcon correctly, 46
> > installations: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=ams
>
> Upstream's latest release is available since January 2016:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/alsamodular/files/alsamodular/2.1.2/
>
> Unfortunately I haven't found yet enough time to upgrade the package
> and fix the RC issue.
> Cheers.
>
>
Thanks for the quick reply, I indeed got confused about the lack of
activity on their homepage at http://alsamodular.sourceforge.net/ - I
really should have checked the files section as well.
Sorry for the trouble, closing this bug.
Reinhard
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
