Your message dated Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:23:40 +0000
with message-id <20150921142340.ga29...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#733678: inkscape: Provide a -dbg package with 
debugging symbols
has caused the Debian Bug report #733678,
regarding inkscape: Provide a -dbg package with debugging symbols
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
733678: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733678
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.48.4-3
Severity: wishlist

Hi!

Could you provide a package containing the debugging symbols of
inkscape, please? (it should help a lot when we get some segfaults, for
example)

Thank you!

Best regards,
Nelson

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages inkscape depends on:
ii  gconf-service        3.2.6-1
ii  libaspell15          0.60.7~20110707-1
ii  libatk1.0-0          2.10.0-2
ii  libatkmm-1.6-1       2.22.7-2
ii  libc6                2.17-97
ii  libcairo2            1.12.16-2
ii  libcairomm-1.0-1     1.10.0-1
ii  libfontconfig1       2.11.0-2
ii  libfreetype6         2.5.2-1
ii  libgc1c2             1:7.2d-6
ii  libgcc1              1:4.8.2-10
ii  libgconf-2-4         3.2.6-1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0   2.28.2-1+b1
ii  libglib2.0-0         2.36.4-1
ii  libglibmm-2.4-1c2a   2.36.2-1
ii  libgnomevfs2-0       1:2.24.4-4
ii  libgomp1             4.8.2-10
ii  libgsl0ldbl          1.16+dfsg-1
ii  libgtk2.0-0          2.24.22-1
ii  libgtkmm-2.4-1c2a    1:2.24.4-1
ii  libgtkspell0         2.0.16-1
ii  liblcms1             1.19.dfsg-1.2+b1
ii  libmagick++5         8:6.7.7.10-7
ii  libmagickcore5       8:6.7.7.10-7
ii  libpango-1.0-0       1.36.0-1+b1
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0  1.36.0-1+b1
ii  libpangoft2-1.0-0    1.36.0-1+b1
ii  libpangomm-1.4-1     2.34.0-1
ii  libpng12-0           1.2.49-5
ii  libpoppler-glib8     0.22.5-3
ii  libpoppler19         0.18.4-10
ii  libpopt0             1.16-8
ii  libsigc++-2.0-0c2a   2.2.10-0.2
ii  libstdc++6           4.8.2-10
ii  libwpd-0.9-9         0.9.9-1
ii  libwpg-0.2-2         0.2.2-1
ii  libx11-6             2:1.6.2-1
ii  libxml2              2.9.1+dfsg1-3
ii  libxslt1.1           1.1.28-2
ii  zlib1g               1:1.2.8.dfsg-1

Versions of packages inkscape recommends:
ii  aspell              0.60.7~20110707-1
ii  imagemagick         8:6.7.7.10-7
pn  libgnomevfs2-extra  <none>
pn  libwmf-bin          <none>
pn  perlmagick          <none>
pn  pstoedit            <none>
ii  python-lxml         3.2.0-1+b1
ii  python-numpy        1:1.7.1-3
pn  transfig            <none>

Versions of packages inkscape suggests:
pn  dia | dia-gnome      <none>
pn  libsvg-perl          <none>
pn  libxml-xql-perl      <none>
pn  python-uniconvertor  <none>
ii  ruby                 1:1.9.3

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:59:50PM +0200, Roland Hieber wrote:
> On 14.09.2015 23:21, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Though I'm really uneasy at adding such a binary package while we are so
> > close to the automatic debug packages (see [0] for more info).
> > 
> > I'm somewhat tempted to mark this as wontfix and just wait some more
> > weeks (yes, because currently it's really blocked on just few needed
> > actions)
> 
> In light of the good news about ddebs, this also seems to me like the most
> resonable solution.

Indeed.
Let me close this bug, then, We already work done that would deserve an
inkscape upload, let's hope FTP masters finishs their work before then.

For reference, here there are a couple of lines regarding ddebs from
their IRC meeting of yesterday:

[09:28:59 PM] <ansgar> Oh, and we need to look at testing the debug
                       packages foo too.
[09:29:31 PM] <@Ganneff> #info need to test debug packages archive too

(yeah, that's really all)
...

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org                              : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to