On 16/07/15 18:59, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2015, 15:46 +0200 schrieb Jack Underwood:
Yes, I know that, I meant we have A suggests B; and A suggests C
which
depends on B, with A as musescore2, B as timgm6mb-soundfont and C as
musescore-soundfont-gm. I wanted to make the point that one of those
suggests seems redundant.
PS: Please note that fluid-soundfont-gm != musescore-soundfont-gm. Is
it possible you mixed these two up?
No, I did mean musescore-soundfont-gm, I have just seen a new package
out, 2.0.2+dfsg-1, and it still lists musescore-soundfont-gm as a
dependency...
While the control file does not list musescore-soundfont-gm as a
dependency, I think it gets automatically added as a dependency because
we list it as building from the same source (if I understand correctly).
Therefore I think we need to add "musescore-soundfont-gm" to suggests
and remove timgm6mb-soundfont as a suggestion as it equates to
musescore-soundfont-gm.
That said, I assume musescore2 still work with old timgm6mb-soundfont?
Best,
Jack
_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
