hmm, nobody ever answered to this email. mira's recent mail regarding a 2nd uploader of qxgedit reminded me of that, and i would like to re-ask:
How much do we want to enforce our ">=2 uploaders per package" rule? If a package does not have a 2nd uploader (any longer), should it be removed from the team (e.g. after some grace period)? If I (intend to) maintain a package that I think fits well under the pkg-multimedia umbrella (in my case, e.g. a puredata related package) but do not find a co-uploader immediately (e.g. see my recent pd-iemtab ITP), should I go solo instead? mfgasdr IOhannes On 2014-11-08 14:53, "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" wrote: > due to a few recent mails [1], i was wondering how much we (would > like to) enforce our ">2 uploaders per package" rule. > > i know of at least one package i maintain under the hood of > pkg-multimedia-maintainers, which has only a single uploader (me, > obviously). > > soundscaperenderer > > > is anybody interested in co-maintaining it (uses CDBS)? or should i > remove this package from the team? > > > mgfsadr IOhannes > > > [1] at least > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2014-November/041903.html; > > but i seem to remember another similar email as well. > > > > _______________________________________________ > pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list > pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
