On Mon, 18 May 2015 16:05:11 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > How would they not be relevant? They recommend users to use ffmpeg and > > list examples of problems they may encounter if they decide to use mpv > > with libav (problems that are regularly reported as mpv bugs). > > Because a) it is not a comparison (as Dmitry introduced it) but a > non-exhaustive list now shrunk to a single concrete item (subtitle > coverage) that you find wrong to focus on and instead bring a different > example of your own, and because b) it is not an assesment of *our* > problem but a different problem that can be solved by running a script > that recompiles against uptodate FFmpeg statically linked against mpv.
Apologies for poor choice of words. Not much of a "comparison" (call it as you
like) this "ffmpeg vs. libav" page contained some insights into pros and cons.
Of course information there was incomplete and that's probably why it was
taken down -- it is not mpv developers' job to maintain "ffmpeg vs. libav"
wiki which opens them for criticism about inaccurate/incomplete/biased
comparison.
I imagine they've made up their minds and that page was not needed any more.
Yet it had some useful information (that's why I mentioned it).
--
Best wishes,
Dmitry Smirnov
GPG key : 4096R/53968D1B
---
It is no use saying, 'We are doing our best.' You have got to succeed
in doing what is necessary.
-- Winston Churchill
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
