>> Hi Tobi, >> >> * Tobias Frost <t...@debian.org> [2014-11-24 22:12]: >>> Ok, pulled from the git and comparing to the version currently in >>> Jessie: >>> As we are in the freeze, you need to create targeted fixes for RC Bugs >>> only.* So the doxygen one isn't. >> >> This seems to be coming from a new Doxygen version and is only needed >> for debclean , but I can revert it without problems. >> >>> And be more detailed in freeze time: >> >> Will do. >> >>> I'd write "Do not ship but create at install time the files ... >>> Is the "register modules" change needed for 767653? (I assume yes, but >>> then the changelog should make that clear too) >> >> That's actually all part of one change, but ended up in two commits, so >> git-dch made two lines out of it. Will change the changelog. >> >>> Why are you moving the util-binaries to the libary package? I would find >>> it better to depend on the utils package instead, (especially as you >>> should consider implement multi-arch for Jessie+1) >> >> openni-utils contains sample applications depending on libopenni0. >> Leaving niReg/niLicense in there would generate a circular dependency, >> as we need them in the libopenni0 postinst. Is there an other option? > > Declaring a circular dependency is not a problem here and well handled by > dpkg. > When postinst is called, both packages are guaranteed to be unpacked, so the > library / binaries are in place at this point of time. (See Policy §7.2) > >> Cheers Jochen >>
I wanted to point you to Policy §8.2 as well, but forgot in the rush. -- it is actually forbidden to have the binaries in the libary package. (<-- some simpications applied; the Policy has details.) -- tobi _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
