Hi, On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Steven Yi <steve...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know how many users use cs or extract. I guess if we change names, > there's a possibility we might break user's scripts or tools if they depend > on those names. On the other hand, if you're doing renaming for extract and > no one has really complained, I suppose changing cs won't be a big issue > either. One thing though, either way if you rename the generated cs binary > or do so in the debian package, I think we should add a note to the manual > about the alternate names.
I would prefer to not deviate from upstream as much as possible. So if upstream finds an alternative name, that would be the preferred solution for me. If upstream doesn't want to rename (which is of course understandable), I will probably rename to csound_cs (for consistency with csound_extract). The extract program should be documented as named csound_extract in debian and derivatives. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
