Oops. Sorry. Pressed the wrong button. Julian
> On 10 Nov 2014, at 05:37, Fabian Greffrath <fab...@greffrath.com> wrote: > > Hi Julian, > > please don't drop the list from CC, we are discussing a team-maintained > package. > > Am Sonntag, den 09.11.2014, 03:59 -0800 schrieb Julian Cable: >> I've just asked myself the same question - I had a go at making the >> changes and it all worked fine. If we add the new libraries to the >> existing packages, there is really only a change to the Makefile.am >> and it's all done! > > I see. I would have prefered the "long" way of running "./configure > --with-drm", then "make", then rename and backup the library, "make > clean" and repeat without "--with-drm". But checking configure.in, I see > that the only difference between a build "--with-drm" and a build > without is actually the two #defines that you add, so I think your way > is even the cleaner solution. > >> I've raised tickets on the upstream projects for this but I don't know >> if Menno Bakker can make time to do a new release. It could be done as >> a Debian patch and i've made the patch files (you would need to review >> and modify the metadata in these). > > I am afraid that upstream is pretty dead now. The latest releases are > more than 5 years old, Menno is working on something different > professionally, I believe, and the latest changes I proposed on the > sourceforge bug tracker weren't even merged by himself anymore, but by > someone else (and this is even more than two years ago). > >> In my experiments I added new binary packages, but I think this is a >> bad idea. > > Why do you think so? I think this should be discussed with the team. > > - Fabian > > > _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
