On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@gmail.com> wrote: > FWIW, I personally think we should not mention any of "lame", > "xvidcore", "x264" or "mplayer2". All of these packages are already in > stable, so the text as current is not exactly news.
Sounds absolutely sensible. What about the debian-multimedia task? [1] Do you think it's worth mentioning? [1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/debian-multimedia.html -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
