Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2014 02:16:01 +0200
with message-id <20140819001601.gd18...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#736832: Double dependencies for vlc-nox
has caused the Debian Bug report #736832,
regarding Double dependencies for vlc-nox
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
736832: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: vlc-nox
Version: 2.1.2-2+b1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Looking at the very long list of dependencies for vlc-nox:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/vlc-nox
I noticed there is a dependency on libavcodec53 or libavcodec54. However
many of the same dependencies are listed for both libavcodec54 and
vlc-nox, such as:
libavutil52 (>= 6:9.1-1)
libspeex1 (>= 1.2~beta3-1)
libtheora0 (>= 1.0)
libvorbis0a (>= 1.1.2)
libvorbisenc2 (>= 1.1.2)
libx264-133
zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.0.2)
The dependency on zlib1g is slightly higher for vlc-nox, but it's an old
version in both cases.
Also one dependency of vlc-nox is essential, dpkg, albeit on an old
version (>= 1.15.6~) - is it necessary to list this any more?
It would be a bit easier to read the dependency list for vlc-nox if it
wasn't quite so long!
Thanks!
Daniel
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2014-01-27 11:49:15, Daniel James wrote:
> Looking at the very long list of dependencies for vlc-nox:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/vlc-nox
>
> I noticed there is a dependency on libavcodec53 or libavcodec54. However
> many of the same dependencies are listed for both libavcodec54 and
> vlc-nox, such as:
>
> libavutil52 (>= 6:9.1-1)
> libspeex1 (>= 1.2~beta3-1)
> libtheora0 (>= 1.0)
> libvorbis0a (>= 1.1.2)
> libvorbisenc2 (>= 1.1.2)
> libx264-133
> zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.0.2)
>
> The dependency on zlib1g is slightly higher for vlc-nox, but it's an old
> version in both cases.
>
> Also one dependency of vlc-nox is essential, dpkg, albeit on an old
> version (>= 1.15.6~) - is it necessary to list this any more?
>
> It would be a bit easier to read the dependency list for vlc-nox if it
> wasn't quite so long!
That's packages.debian.org's way to display the dependencies the exists
across the different architectures. The might not be exactly the same
for various reasons (architectures lagging behind, etc.). In the actual
package they are only listed once, so there is nothing to do for us here
and I'm closing this bug report.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
